The question of one’s legality of your own Rev

The question of one’s legality of your own Rev

1857.

3rd.-The brand new 4th anniversary from Judge “Crown and you can Anchor” An excellent.O.F. ended up being recognized because of the a food in the Bro. Franklin’s, Hallway Quay. Mr. C. B. Dashwood filled the latest sofa, and it also was reported that the fresh Judge upcoming consisted of 90 people.

The month of january

Messrs. Charles J. Palmer, B. Fenn, Rev. H. Squire, Dumbleton, Roentgen. R. B. Norman, Burton, and you can J. Bayly had been picked the newest members of the public Library Committee.

p. 207 You of good whale, which was taken within Winterton, was being exhibited into the Chapel Basic.

The new Rev. W. D. Go, the minister out-of St. Mary’s, Southtown, had, before you leave Southsea, come served with a bag away from ?61.

twenty-first.-The latest “Sisters” is into the crash with among the many brick piers out of brand new Bridge, it had much more broken.

Feb. fourth.-A keen Anti-Income tax fulfilling ended up being held at Area Hall. The latest Gran presided, as well as the pursuing the participated in what’s going on:-Messrs. George Danby-Palmer, Bradbeer, Garson Blake, W. Livingston, S. B. Cory, R. Hammond, J. Clowes, J. H. Harrison, J. Rivett and you will J. Fiddes. Mr. S. Bradbeer appeared to be new mover contained in this amount.

Feb. twenty-first.-An excellent “Poor’s Rates” meeting was actually kept from the Masonic Hall. Mr. W. Livingston presided, and you may an answer protesting from the 1s. 6d. every quarter price is actually used. Messrs J. Rivett, Joseph Neave, Royal, Roentgen. Bailey, Nichols, and you can F. Starling spoke on the subject, as the perform of your Guardians try defended because of the Mr. J. H. Harrison, one of the Panel.

Feb. 25th.-An incident hence delighted considerable appeal, had been heard from the County Judge, Tolhouse-hall, before the Judge (T. J. Birch, Esq.) The fresh plaintiff try Mr. John Cobb, leather vendor, for exactly who Mr. C. H. Chamberlin featured; brand new defendants was indeed Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and you will Grams. D. Palmer, have been represented of the Mr. J. L. Cufaude. The latest plaintiff reported that he had been an applicant into office regarding Councillor for the age eg at solicitation off Messrs. W. Letter. Burroughs and G. D. Palmer. At that time he turned an applicant the guy extremely told them he would not shell out regarding his very own wallet a lot more than ?ten towards the expenditures of your own election, therefore are understood your Liberal group, that he belonged, perform sign up the others. The night before election he acquired an estimate out of what the expense was basically apt to be, plus outcome of he at a time watched both Mr. Burroughs and you can Mr. G. D. Palmer. One to guess, he noticed, amounted to in the ?forty-five, kissbrides.com see it here given that subscriptions completely amounted in order to however, ?42. After some conversation they agreed to hold your innocuous of one’s amount of the expense which may surpass the sum signed up, in which he and you will Mr. Burroughs following ran p. 208 into the Committee-room of your own North-ward, where Mr. Burroughs told you they had generated agreements due to their buddy John Cobb winning industry-ward. The costs of one’s election, he (the plaintiff) missing, amounted altogether so you’re able to ?58 1s. 7d. The balance, ergo, that he now advertised from the defendants try ?16 1s. 7d.-New plaintiff, from inside the get across-test by the Mr. Cufaude, acknowledge that ?39 of whole number are having – -.-Mr. Cufaude contended that in case, since the plaintiff stated, this new defendants got provided him a guarantee on excessive costs, the new make certain should have creating. And you will, and if the data is correct, and that, not, he disputed, it absolutely was hopeless on the plaintiff to recuperate, inasmuch when he themselves got allowed you to definitely a corner off the full expenses is getting – -, that was an unlawful operate.-Mr. Chamberlin debated that plaintiff, immediately after acquiring brand new guarantee about defendants, acted only up on new believe of the vow, which ergo, because they got entered through to an engagement to expend the money, they certainly were accountable. The cash, furthermore, had not been spent by plaintiff, but of the panel designated to conduct new election, and through to the election is actually more, the fresh new plaintiff wasn’t conscious that any of the money got become spent into the – -.-His Honour said it absolutely was obvious the newest make certain should have started in writing. He had been regarding advice, as well as, that the plaintiff was not destined to pay the illegal fees, and consequently he may maybe not promote his action for money which he advertised.-New plaintiff try, properly, non-cure.